Why Relying on Just Ubuntu LTS Isn’t Enough Anymore

For years, Ubuntu LTS (Long Term Support) releases have been the go-to choice for developers, sysadmins, and enterprises looking for stability and predictability. With five years of guaranteed security updates and a focus on long-term compatibility, Ubuntu LTS versions like 20.04 and 22.04 have become foundational in many production environments. However, as the pace of innovation accelerates and software requirements evolve, relying solely on Ubuntu LTS is increasingly becoming a liability rather than an advantage.

In this article, we’ll explore why Ubuntu LTS is no longer sufficient on its own, especially for organizations and users who need to stay competitive in a rapidly changing tech landscape.

The Innovation Gap Is Growing

Ubuntu LTS is released every two years, with a five-year support cycle. While this cadence is great for ensuring stability, it inherently lags behind the cutting edge. Newer libraries, tools, languages, and kernel features can take years to arrive in LTS releases—if they arrive at all during the support window.

For example, consider the case of Python. New features in Python 3.10 or 3.11 may not be available in an LTS release that ships with Python 3.8, even though the wider Python ecosystem may have already moved on. This gap creates compatibility issues when developers try to use modern libraries or frameworks that depend on more recent versions.

Similarly, developers working with containers, Kubernetes, machine learning, or bleeding-edge hardware often find themselves constrained by outdated packages in Ubuntu LTS. The result? They’re forced to compile from source, use external repositories, or run containerized environments just to access modern tooling—adding layers of complexity and risk.

Security Through Obsolescence Isn’t Viable

One of the biggest selling points of Ubuntu LTS is security: Canonical provides critical security updates for the core system and select packages. However, this model doesn’t always keep up with vulnerabilities in the wider software ecosystem.

Modern software stacks are composed of hundreds of dependencies, many of which are not part of the Ubuntu "main" repository. For packages in the "universe" repository—maintained by the community—updates are not guaranteed. That means even with an LTS base, many tools and libraries can become outdated and vulnerable within months, not years.

To maintain true security, organizations often end up patching or upgrading these components independently, which defeats the purpose of sticking to an LTS in the first place. Moreover, Canonical’s Extended Security Maintenance (ESM) for older LTS versions is a paid service, making long-term reliance potentially costly.

Modern Development Demands Faster Feedback Loops

Agile and DevOps practices emphasize rapid iteration, frequent releases, and continuous integration. In this context, the slow-moving nature of Ubuntu LTS becomes a bottleneck. Developers want access to the latest toolchains, IDEs, and runtime environments. Sticking to older versions for the sake of stability often means slower development cycles and increased technical debt.

Even CI/CD systems like GitHub Actions, GitLab CI, and Jenkins are increasingly tuned for newer toolchains. If you're stuck with a base system from two years ago, chances are you're also dealing with outdated compilers, broken dependencies, or unsupported build tools—all of which slow down developers.

For example, a development team using Ubuntu 22.04 might find it doesn’t support the latest WebAssembly tooling, Rust nightly builds, or modern GPU support out-of-the-box. Teams then spend time and effort backporting or containerizing these tools, introducing additional operational overhead.

The Rise of Immutable and Minimal Operating Systems

The Linux ecosystem itself is changing. Distributions like Fedora Silverblue, openSUSE MicroOS, and Ubuntu’s own Core OS are exploring immutable and container-first models that make traditional LTS assumptions outdated. These systems prioritize atomic updates, reproducibility, and minimal host footprints—features that LTS simply doesn’t focus on.

Container orchestration platforms like Kubernetes also shift the burden of stability from the base OS to the container itself. In many cases, it makes more sense to use a minimal or rolling base image tailored to your application stack than to rely on a heavyweight LTS system.

In cloud-native and edge computing environments, Ubuntu LTS can be overkill or simply not a good fit. Systems are ephemeral, and agility trumps tradition. Here, the old "set it and forget it" mindset of LTS has less relevance.

More Projects Are Requiring Newer Dependencies

Increasingly, open-source projects are setting higher minimum requirements for system packages. You may find that the latest version of a popular tool like Docker, Kubernetes, or even PostgreSQL won’t run properly—or at all—on older Ubuntu LTS versions.

This trend is not just about chasing the latest shiny thing. Many of these newer versions fix major security flaws, improve performance, and offer better interoperability. Staying on an older LTS can lock you out of meaningful upgrades and features.

Worse yet, some software vendors stop supporting older LTS versions altogether. You're then left in the uncomfortable position of running unsupported software on a supposedly "supported" OS.

The Myth of LTS as “Set and Forget”

Many organizations adopt LTS releases thinking they can avoid major upgrades for five years. While technically true for the core OS, this mindset rarely works in real-world systems. Applications evolve. Security threats change. Hardware becomes obsolete.

Pretending that a five-year-old stack can keep pace with modern requirements is risky. In practice, teams often find themselves retrofitting newer components onto an aging OS base, leading to brittle systems and operational inconsistencies.

Worse, when the time finally comes to upgrade—say, from Ubuntu 18.04 to 22.04—the migration effort is significant. The greater the gap between versions, the more likely you’ll encounter broken dependencies, deprecated APIs, and unexpected behavior. Frequent, incremental upgrades are usually less painful than massive overhauls every few years.

Alternatives and Middle Grounds

This doesn’t mean Ubuntu LTS has no place. It’s still a solid choice for many workloads, especially when combined with best practices. However, it shouldn't be the only base you rely on.

Some strategies to consider:

Use interim Ubuntu releases (like 24.04 or 23.10) in dev environments to test newer features before they arrive in LTS.
Containerize applications using rolling distros like Arch or Alpine to decouple them from the host OS.
Adopt tools like Snap or Flatpak to get newer applications on older systems.
Explore minimal base images like Ubuntu Minimal, Debian Slim, or even custom Linux builds.
Regularly upgrade between LTS versions—don’t wait five years.

Conclusion

Ubuntu LTS is a powerful tool, but it's not a one-size-fits-all solution. The world of software is moving faster than ever, and relying solely on LTS can hold you back in terms of security, performance, and innovation. To stay agile and competitive, teams must complement LTS with more modern, flexible approaches.

Whether that means mixing in interim releases, embracing containers, or moving to more dynamic operating systems, the key takeaway is clear: stability alone isn't enough anymore. It’s time to rethink how we balance long-term support with the need to stay current.

Get a Better Ubuntu Offer with Btech!

Btech now offers a great solution to your Ubuntu LTS as now we provide a license for Ubuntu Pro!

Head to our whatsapp now +62-811-1123-242 / contact@btech.id